Skip to content
Lip Lift Korea

Lip lift (philtrum shortening) in Korea: incision design, scars and recovery

Lip lift with nose surgery

How are lip lift and nasal surgery planned together?

The nasal base is relevant to both upper-lip lifting and nasal surgery. Combined procedures have been reported; planning should identify each incision and account for previous operations when considering a combined or staged approach.[1][2]

Written by the Lip Lift Korea editorial team from the cited sources. Last updated: .

Where do the two operations meet?

The columella sits between the nostrils and the sill forms each nostril’s lower border. A subnasal lip lift removes skin close to these structures. Some nasal procedures also involve the columella or alar base, making a combined review of incision locations useful.[3][2]

Break a wish to change the nose into the specific areas involved: tip, alar width, profile angle or its relationship with the lip.

Likewise, state the intended lip change separately. This avoids assuming that a broad request for facial balance identifies the operation needed in each area.

Can lip lift alone change the nasal relationship?

A retrospective study of subnasal lip lift without concurrent rhinoplasty found changes in alar width and the nasolabial angle alongside lip measures.[4]

This angle describes the profile relationship of the lower nose to the upper lip. The shared region therefore matters even when the nose itself is not being operated on.[4]

Ask to review the front view and profile separately. Discuss whether the change sought from rhinoplasty and the change sought from lip lifting affect the same boundary. An explanation of only one operation leaves part of that relationship unaddressed.

What does the combined-surgery literature describe?

A systematic review of simultaneous rhinoplasty and lip lift included 6 studies and 361 patients. It considered aesthetic changes, satisfaction and function.[1]

One retrospective series included in that review described 51 cases combining open rhinoplasty, lip lift and alar reduction through independent incisions. Its scope was primary rhinoplasty in patients without other operations or prior trauma in the oronasal region.[1][2]

When reviewing research, identify whether it concerns first-time or repeat surgery, where the incisions were placed and what was measured. Ask which features of the proposed operation resemble the published approach.

What if alar reduction is also planned?

Alar reduction can involve the nostril base, close to subnasal lip lifting. The published combined series used separate incisions for the procedures. The phrase combined surgery therefore should not be taken to mean that all work uses a single shared incision.[2]

Have each line marked and identify where the lines approach one another. If both narrower alae and greater lateral red-lip display are goals, explain them separately. Ask what the plan would be if only one operation were performed, so the contribution of each is clear.

Areas to clarify in a combined plan
Proposed workLocation to reviewDocument
Subnasal liftBelow the columella and nostril sillsExcision and deeper fixation
Nasal surgeryActual tip, columellar or other operative areaIncision and structural changes
Alar reductionAlar base and nostril sillRelationship to the lip lift line
Previous surgeryExisting incisions and fixation sitesRecords and new operative scope

How should combined and staged plans be compared?

For a combined plan, review the separate goals, incision locations and postoperative appointments together.

For a staged plan, ask what the first operation establishes and what will be reassessed before the next. Keep the preference for fewer trips separate from the clinical reasoning about sequence.

If an interval is proposed, ask what state of healing or appearance the team wants to assess. Is the next decision based on the nasal form, upper-lip position or scar development? An explanation of the assessment is more useful than searching for a universal waiting interval.

Bring records of previous nose and lip operations, including their dates and names. Even surgery performed elsewhere belongs in the planning discussion. The records help describe where earlier work was done, rather than relying only on the current surface appearance.

Before choosing combined or staged surgery, ask about combining lip lift with nose surgery using your previous operation records and the changes you want from each procedure.

What should be clear before choosing?

Compare the purpose and scope of lip lift alone, nasal surgery alone and any combined proposal. If an added procedure does not connect to an expressed goal, ask for that link to be explained.

For the combined estimate, also identify which appointments assess which part of the operation.

Have combined operations been studied?

A 2024 review of simultaneous rhinoplasty and lip lift included 6 studies and 361 patients. That total includes a series of 51 people who also had alar reduction. [1] Of those 51 people, 4 rated their lip-lift scar as less than optimal. Follow-up ranged from 4 months to 2 years. [2]

Will alar reduction share the lip lift incision?

Published combined surgery has used independent incisions. Ask to see the actual lines in your plan. [2]

What should I ask about staging?

Ask what the first operation aims to change and what must be reassessed before the next. Discuss travel preferences separately.

References

(4)

Bibliographic records retrieved from PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine).

  1. Alnami R, Ahmed S, Alashrah AS, et al. Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes of Simultaneous Rhinoplasty and Lip Lift Surgery: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024;16(11):e73369.

  2. Saman M, Sharifi A. The Safety and Outcomes of Simultaneous Open Rhinoplasty, Alar Reduction, and Upper Lip-Lift through One Surgery. World J Plast Surg. 2024;13(1):32-36.

  3. Sturm A. Lip Lift. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2022;55(4):835-847.

  4. Marechek A, Perenack J, Christensen BJ. Subnasal Lip Lift and Its Effect on Nasal Esthetics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;79(4):895-901.